uc pseudonym wrote:First, I don't think the Violence rating deserves a nine. It is nowhere near as violent or gruesome as a great many anime I have seen. There is only a great deal of blood, no gore or lost limbs.
Rocklobster wrote:Grubb, sometimes the fansubs are a bit "colorful" with the language. For example, the fansubbed version of Azumanga Daioh had an F-Bomb in the first episode. But the "official" version ADV did uses nicer words.
GrubbTheFragger wrote:Yea true but i though i would just point it out.
Jon_jinn wrote:yeah. well, i believe that it would be good if the author simply stated that the language really depends on the fan subs. the ones who subbed my episodes kept the language quite on the clean side.
Just to clarify: are you asking the rating in the review to be lowered, or asking if the series is alright for you? How early in the series are you? If you're at the point of your avatar, you've already seen pretty much everything it has to offer in the way of offensive content.
rurouninaruto wrote:Anyway, back on topic.... Could anyone try to change the age limit to 14+ sometime soon? Thanks!^^
Mangafanatic wrote:Let's all give pocky to Brok3n Rhythm for a great Bleach review!
Mod note: This review seemed very complete, and the writer obviously went to great lengths to detail this review. However, I could find very few sources who talked much about content issues in Bleach, and therefore I couldn't do as much double checking as I generally like. All the threads on CAA which talked about Bleach objectionable content seemed to line up with the reivew, and, for this reason, I believe this review to be complete and thorough. However if those of you who've seen the show feel something should be added, please PM me!
Return to Anime and Anime Reviews
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 285 guests