Postby Technomancer » Tue Jan 13, 2004 9:45 am
Gremio, can you back up your assertion with details from the scientific literature (peer reviewed journals, that sort of thing)?
I would strongly urge people interested in the subject to learn the actual science involved from
the scientists themselves. Listening to what Pastor so-and-so has to say about the subject is rarely worthwhile since such indivduals are often incapable of giving accurate descriptions of the science that they purport to debunk. I'd give the same advice regarding any system of thought e.g find out from Hindus about Hinduism, Catholics about Catholicism and so on. There is no substitute for reliable knowledge.
A good starting point might be
http://www.talkorigins.org, or books such as "Puntnam's Geology", or other texts on historical geology and paleontology.
It's also worth pointing out that most major Christian denominations (Catholic, Anglican, United, Lutheran, etc) do not have any official opposition to the current scientific thinking about these matters.
The scientific method," Thomas Henry Huxley once wrote, "is nothing but the normal working of the human mind." That is to say, when the mind is working; that is to say further, when it is engaged in corrrecting its mistakes. Taking this point of view, we may conclude that science is not physics, biology, or chemistry—is not even a "subject"—but a moral imperative drawn from a larger narrative whose purpose is to give perspective, balance, and humility to learning.
Neil Postman
(The End of Education)
Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge
Isaac Aasimov