This took far too long...
Mr. Smarty Pants wrote:I'm just presenting some info I saw. Not saying I agree with it or not
I assumed you were just contributing something you had read to the discussion, and I think kaemmerite did as well. So we weren't attacking you, just giving (admittedly acidic) comments about the theory.
ikimasu wrote:Oh wait... it all makes sence now! There is a 4th triforce peice... 10 actually. In the original NES game, the triforce of wisdom was broken into 8 pieces! so.... 8 + the original 2.... equals 10!
Actually, this brings up one very valid point: the idea of the Triforce has probably evolved over time. I don't think there was a fully developed idea of Power/Wisdom/Courage parts in the first game (though I could be wrong). Similarly, if Nintendo wanted to make a Fourth Triforce, they could do that too.
Linksquest wrote:mebbe it because each piece is a triangle... and why each piece is called separately the Triforce of Power, Triforce of Courage, Triforce of Wisdom. A Fourth Triforce (Triangle) fitting in the middle would make the current triforce a giant three pointed triangle... TRI = 3 people.
I'm fairly certain that if they made another piece, they would actually say that the three pieces we know are actually just fragments of the
real Triforce, called thus because it is a triangle.
Tom Dincht wrote:Um....who cares?
Let`s just stop debating about thinking outside of the game. We can decide what we think about videogames. We don`t need to try to change the other person`s mind.
I do think this is somewhat unnecessary. However, it is valid to point out that no one needs to get too upset over this. That having been said, I'm finding this discussion somewhat interesting and occasionally humorous.
Linksquest wrote:One basic point of proof that you guys aren't looking at that i have already stated... the fourth triforce is ON THE HYLIAN SHIELD in OoT!!!!
Now I shall apply a level of thought that was probably never intended...
That shield is apparently standard issue, as you can receive multiple ones and a Hylian guard can give you a discount. Therefore, they are made by some Hylian artisan and have some sort of tie to the royal family. If that is truly a mystical fourth piece of the Triforce, how did they obtain knowledge of it? Furthermore, why wouldn't they mention it when describing the origins of the Triforce? For that matter, if the Triforce was sealed in the Temple of Time, what about this fourth piece? Was it sealed as well? If not, why not?
Linksquest wrote:But there is a fourth... Oni Link... (Fierce Deity Link)
Given that there are four dungeons on the Moon, I think it is more fair to say the fourth "form" is Link himself. Oni Link is another issue altogether, and a fairly randomly added one, in my mind. Not that I didn't like it.
Linksquest wrote:... Yet. And also... How do you know that it is meant to be taken literally...
The red Phoenix could represent something preventing the fourth from being with the other three. or something that took it away, or could represent the fourth goddess herself. Just because it hasn't happened yet, doesn't mean it won't happen.
I don't see a reason to interpret part of it literally and part of it symbolically. On that subject, since when has the Legend of Zelda series ever done much with symbolism? Not exactly classic literature.
ikimasu wrote:Look at link's mirror sheld! It has the Islamic moon/star symbol on it!So the truth unfolds. Link is really on a holy jihad.
Linksquest wrote:Link also had a Cross in the first two games on his shield... does that mean he's a crusade? These are real world symbols... symbolizing real world things.
It seems fairly obvious to me that Link has switched sides in what is obviously representative of the war over the Holy Land. Most likely this is because the game developers changed religions midway through the series. Look for a Link sporting a Star of David in Twilight Princess!
Linksquest wrote:Just because you say it doesn't mean anything... doesn't make it mean nothing
This doesn't invalidate what you said, but yes, that is exactly what it means.
Linksquest wrote:Making fun of me doesn't make your statements any more valid.
I cannot truly speak for kaemmerite, but I'm fairly certain his intent wasn't to make fun of you. He explained it thus earlier:
kaemmerite wrote:I've done the exact same thing you've done, so if you say my conclusions are absurd, then by your own definition your arguments are absurd.
He is saying that if a method can be shown to reach false conclusions, we should not view it as proof. This seems very reasonable to me.
kaemmerite wrote:Or maybe it's just to make the shield look cool.
I personally think it was to make it obvious it is a shield (because with low-pixel graphics there could be confusion). The cross is associated with shields because of Crusades, so many would make the connection.
kaemmerite wrote:The Deku Shield. Neat little symbol. What does it mean? Probably nothing. Just there to make it look cool.
Note that it has
three curling lines.