War Of The Worlds

TV, Movies, Sports...you can find it all in here.

War Of The Worlds

Postby Radical Dreamer » Wed Jun 29, 2005 8:38 pm

Wow. Just got back from seeing this one. I thought it was great!! :thumb: The special effects were phenomenal (after all, it is a Spielburg film!), the acting was very good (Dakota Fanning is a fantastic actor for her age), I loved the cinematography, the whole thing was well done. It was intense, but not without enough comic relief. A very good movie, I reccommend it! :thumb:

[SPOILER]For anyone who's seen it, I noticed a lot of symbolism. For instance, when the church was destroyed, I thought that kind of showed that there was no hope for the people. Also, at the end, the bud on the tree symbolized life, and how everything would grow back and flourish once again. Anyways, who else noticed that?[/SPOILER]
[color="DeepSkyBlue"]4 8 15 16 23[/color] 42
[color="PaleGreen"]Rushia: YOU ARE MY FAVORITE IGNORANT AMERICAN OF IRISH DECENT. I LOVE YOU AND YOUR POTATOES.[/color]
[color="Orange"]WELCOME TO MOES[/color]

Image

User avatar
Radical Dreamer
 
Posts: 7950
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Some place where I can think up witty things to say under the "Location" category.

Postby Jasdero » Wed Jun 29, 2005 9:02 pm

Yes! It was! I saw it with my friends from church and it was awesome. *__* We're going to see it again on Saturday.
× s h i n i e s , y e s ? ×


does it not burn... LIKE THE SUN?!
User avatar
Jasdero
 
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 5:00 am
Location: BANCOUCH ()[_ò_ó_]()

Postby glitch1501 » Wed Jun 29, 2005 9:14 pm

i watched the origional war of the worlds on saturday, and im going to see the new one later today

Glitch's Photostream


He wants them to learn to walk and must therefore take away His hand; and if only the will to walk is really there, He is pleased even with their stumbles.

Image

Healing hands of God have mercy on our unclean souls
once again. Jesus Christ, Light of the World, burning
bright within our hearts forever. Freedom means love
without condition, without beginning or an end. Here's
my heart, let it be forever Yours, only You can make
every new day seem so new.
Every New Day - On Distant Shores - Five Iron Frenzy

Nail pierced hands they run with blood
A splitting brow forced by the thorns
His face is writhing with the pain yet it's comforting to me
Passion - Kutless
:thumb:
Image
User avatar
glitch1501
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 6:50 pm
Location: the debris section

Postby Warrior 4 Jesus » Wed Jun 29, 2005 9:52 pm

I get a bit peeved when an english book that is set in LONDON in the 1890s is updated to nowdays and set in AMERICA of all places. American movie makers think the world revolves around America, or that it is the only place aliens would attack. Don't get me started on the historical inaccuracies in Pearl Harbour! Anyway, I still want to see this movie because Steven Speilberg is a very good director and I wish to see what he's done with the material.
User avatar
Warrior 4 Jesus
 
Posts: 4844
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 10:52 pm
Location: The driest continent that isn't Antarctica.

Postby Link Antilles » Thu Jun 30, 2005 5:28 am

I'm going on Saturday, I look very much forward to seeing this.


Warrior 4 Jesus wrote:I get a bit peeved when an english book that is set in LONDON in the 1890s is updated to nowdays and set in AMERICA of all places. American movie makers think the world revolves around America, or that it is the only place aliens would attack.


America is a good place to start an alien invasion, though. ;)
User avatar
Link Antilles
 
Posts: 2528
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 4:00 am
Location: South Carolina

Postby windtalker » Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:40 pm

I love the book. I'd like to see the movie made faithfully from the book. I think it would be cool but maybe I'm the only one who does.
Anyway -- I'll probably catch it this week sometime.
User avatar
windtalker
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:16 pm
Location: In The Kingdom

Postby glitch1501 » Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:23 pm

well, i just got back from it.....unfortunatly its absolutly nothing like the book or the original movie.....

it was a good movie, but i think i like the story of the original movie better.

Glitch's Photostream


He wants them to learn to walk and must therefore take away His hand; and if only the will to walk is really there, He is pleased even with their stumbles.

Image

Healing hands of God have mercy on our unclean souls
once again. Jesus Christ, Light of the World, burning
bright within our hearts forever. Freedom means love
without condition, without beginning or an end. Here's
my heart, let it be forever Yours, only You can make
every new day seem so new.
Every New Day - On Distant Shores - Five Iron Frenzy

Nail pierced hands they run with blood
A splitting brow forced by the thorns
His face is writhing with the pain yet it's comforting to me
Passion - Kutless
:thumb:
Image
User avatar
glitch1501
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 6:50 pm
Location: the debris section

Postby redkorn » Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:29 pm

I just got back from seeing it also, and i give it two thumbs up! The specail effects was great there was non-stop action from start to end and i was on the edge of my seat from the start to the end. Its a must see this summer!
User avatar
redkorn
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:45 pm
Location: near Pittsburgh,PA

Postby the_lizardqueen » Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:34 pm

Warrior 4 Jesus wrote:I get a bit peeved when an english book that is set in LONDON in the 1890s is updated to nowdays and set in AMERICA of all places. American movie makers think the world revolves around America, or that it is the only place aliens would attack.

I dunno, did the invasion actually start in America? I remember hearing a great deal about how Spielberg wanted to only depict events that the main character witnessed (i.e. the scene with the massive battle over the hill that the audience and the hero didn't see). So it would kinda make sense that the main character wouldn't know what's going on elsewhere in the world, or the next state for that matter with the communication networks out. Though if you want to go after Spielberg for picking an American dude as his hero, go for it ;)

I just saw the movie tonight. It was kinda dark for a birthday movie choice, but the CG was amazing and the action sequences were awesome. The initial scene, where the Tripod emerges from underground, was so jaw droppingly sweet :grin:
[color="lightgreen"]"There is an art, or rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."

-The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy[/color]
User avatar
the_lizardqueen
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 12:08 pm
Location: The Canadian prairies

Postby Hitokiri » Sat Jul 02, 2005 12:55 pm

::drinks water and breathes deeply to calm heart beat::

I do NOT do well during stressful movies....Signs stressed me out. This....whooooa boy...my leg is sore from bouncing it up and down on the rail in front of me.

Other then that I loved it. Great acting, great CGI, great story IMO and awesome feeling. I hate the feeling but the feeling you get when you can't escape from something that is chasing you...quite possibly one of worst feelings in my opinion. I connected with Cruise during the scene when running away from the ship in the starting and hiding behind buildings and in his house...no where to hide.

::takes some asprin for his headaches::
User avatar
Hitokiri
 
Posts: 3475
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Yatsushiro-shi, Kumamoto-ken

Postby the_lizardqueen » Sat Jul 02, 2005 1:15 pm

I agree Hitokiri, twas a very, very tremendously stressful movie. But in a fun way :grin:

Oo, I also nearly forgot about that. I spent the entire movie comparing it to Signs and Independence Day, it was kinda like some crazy cinematic merging of them, with way better effects. I think that bacteria made a far better anti-alien defence than water...
[color="lightgreen"]"There is an art, or rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."

-The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy[/color]
User avatar
the_lizardqueen
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 12:08 pm
Location: The Canadian prairies

Postby Gypsy » Sat Jul 02, 2005 3:46 pm

I'm looking forward to seeing this soon. Have any of you actually listened to the old, original radio broadcast (you know, the one where people thought it was real and all)? It's pretty cool.
||Skipping Tomorrows Webmanga||
"A ship in harbor is safe but that is not what ships are built for." - John A. Shedd
User avatar
Gypsy
 
Posts: 4056
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Hyrule

Postby Mangafanatic » Sat Jul 02, 2005 4:41 pm

. . . I sort of. . . thought it was lame.

I mean, yeah, the special affects were incredible, but the story itself was lacked strong flow. In essence the film could be broken down like this

15 minutes of character development.
1 hour of running from aliens
45 minutes of watching Tom and his daughter in a basement.
15 minutes of a lame and somewhat unexplained ending

Overall, I just thought the movie was all about special effects and it lacked the elements which would connect the audience with the characters. Additionally, there were just some "Um, and why is it that. . ." kind of stuff. Such as:

[spoiler]At the beginning of the movie, everyone is getting vaporized by the aliens. Sudddenly, half way through, Mr. Spielberg must have decided that wasn't gruesome enough and he decided instead to make the alien suck blood. From then on, the aliens instead captured their prey and sucked the blood out of them. Nas.ty. So, why the crud was it that they changed suddenly?[/spoiler]

[spoiler] Okay, so the idea is that BILLIONS of years ago, before human life had even "evolved" on the planet's surface, the aliens planted these ships under our feet, ne? Well, so it turns out the aliens want our blood and that APPEARS to be the only reason that the creators of the film supply us with as a reason for this invasion of our planet. With that said, care to explain how it is that that works when there WEREN'T EVEN PEOPLE AROUND WHEN THE ALIEN PLANETED THEIR SHIPS HERE!?[/spoiler]
Every year in Uganda, innumerable children simply. . . disappear. These children all stolen under the cover of darkness from their homes and impressed into the guerilla armies of the LRA [Lord's Resistance Army]. In the deserts of Uganda, they are forced to witness the mindless slaughter of other children until they themselves can do nothing but kill. Kill. These children, generally ranging from ages 5-12, are brainwashed into murdering in the name of the resistance and into stealing other children from their beds to suffer the same fate.

Because of this genocide of innocence, hundred and hundreds of children live every night sleeping in public places miles from their homes, because they know that if the do not-- they will disappear. They will become just another number in this genocide to which the international community has chosen to turn a blind eye. They will become, in affect, invisible-- Invisible Children.

But there are those who are trying to fight against this slaughter of Uganda's children. They fight to protect these "invisible children." Please, help them help a country full of children who know nothing by fear. Help save the innocence. For more information concerning how you can help and how you can get an incredible video about this horrific reality, visit the Invisible Children home page.
User avatar
Mangafanatic
 
Posts: 4918
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 5:00 am
Location: In La-La land.

Postby wilson1112000 » Sat Jul 02, 2005 5:00 pm

I think that the original is probably alot better than the newer one. I don't know, because I haven't watched it yet, but the original was more based on Christianity, in fact, in the end of the movie, they show a verse of the bible at the end, which, in short, said that God would protect them. I liked that one alot, but this new one seemed to be based on more humanistic aspect of survival.
Praise the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your might, for that is what we were created for.
----------------------------------------------------------------
We've got to speed things up in this hotel. Chef, if a guest orders a three-minute egg, give it to him in two minutes.
If he orders a two-minute egg, give it to him in one minute.
If he orders a one-minute egg, give him a chicken and let him work it out for himself.


Groucho in A Night in Casablanca (movie)
---------------------------------------------------------------

Chinese Finger trap: noun 1. A puzzle that is supposed to test ones ability at problem solveing. or 2. The manifistation of Satan in a cardborad tube.

You decide.
User avatar
wilson1112000
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: I don't know, and I realy don't care.

Postby zelda » Sat Jul 02, 2005 5:01 pm

My parents are going to see it tonight.
@)}~`,~ Carry This Rose In Your Signature, As Thanks, To All The CAA Moderators.
User avatar
zelda
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 6:10 pm
Location: here

Postby Warrior 4 Jesus » Sat Jul 02, 2005 6:48 pm

Wilson, HG Wells was a strong humanist but I remember that last line in the book and it really illustrates that Wells struggles with the idea that there may be a God watching us and protecting us. I think the line is very appropriate but unusual for a book written by a humanist. Infact it is that last line that many non-Christians get upset over when they read the book!

Lizardqueen, I haven't seen the recent movie but I know the book's invasion began in LONDON in 1890's and it makes much more sense to keep it in that era and location.
User avatar
Warrior 4 Jesus
 
Posts: 4844
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 10:52 pm
Location: The driest continent that isn't Antarctica.

Postby wilson1112000 » Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:11 pm

Wow....I realy need to read the book!
Praise the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your might, for that is what we were created for.
----------------------------------------------------------------
We've got to speed things up in this hotel. Chef, if a guest orders a three-minute egg, give it to him in two minutes.
If he orders a two-minute egg, give it to him in one minute.
If he orders a one-minute egg, give him a chicken and let him work it out for himself.


Groucho in A Night in Casablanca (movie)
---------------------------------------------------------------

Chinese Finger trap: noun 1. A puzzle that is supposed to test ones ability at problem solveing. or 2. The manifistation of Satan in a cardborad tube.

You decide.
User avatar
wilson1112000
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: I don't know, and I realy don't care.

Postby the_lizardqueen » Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:53 pm

Lizardqueen, I haven't seen the recent movie but I know the book's invasion began in LONDON in 1890's and it makes much more sense to keep it in that era and location.

That's a good point. But the book was written by an English author and published in the 1890's. So at the time it was intended to be set in the present day (19th c.) in the author's homeland, which probably added to the realism and the scare factor. Perhaps the directors and writers behind the film were attempting to achieve the same effect. And maybe they were concerned that audiences would have a harder time relating to and fearing for people from a completely different era.

It definitely would have been a completely different film if it adhered to the book, and in a way I can see how it might have been scarier. For one thing, human warfare technology has advanced significantly, which detracts a little from the sense of helplessness. Still, I'm thinking I'll have to read the book someday.

Overall though, I always find that movie adaptations never seem to match the source material in terms of quality. Even at their best. That's why I think perhaps it's a good thing that the new movie is quite different from the book, it stands less chance of altering a reader's interpretation. Imagination tends to be scarier than anything a movie can come up with.
[color="lightgreen"]"There is an art, or rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."

-The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy[/color]
User avatar
the_lizardqueen
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 12:08 pm
Location: The Canadian prairies

Postby Shao Feng-Li » Sun Jul 03, 2005 4:57 am

I have a collections of H.G Wells. I'll get around to reading this one... M. Night Shyamalan should of done it.
User avatar
Shao Feng-Li
 
Posts: 5187
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Idaho

Postby Sesshoumaru » Sun Jul 03, 2005 10:46 am

Spielberg. At. His. Best.


Is in essence what I rate this movie.
Image
User avatar
Sesshoumaru
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 10:00 am
Location: Buh buh buh buh buh BROOOOKLYN

Postby agasfas » Sun Jul 03, 2005 12:06 pm

Mangafanatic wrote:I mean, yeah, the special affects were incredible, but the story itself was lacked strong flow. In essence the film could be broken down like this

15 minutes of character development.
1 hour of running from aliens
45 minutes of watching Tom and his daughter in a basement.
15 minutes of a lame and somewhat unexplained ending


I agree. I saw it the first day it came out and I didn't know what to think right after it finished. At first I thought it was good, but then the way it ended kind of got under my skin. And to top it off, there was little to no character development

[spoiler]The fact the aliens planted the ships before humans "supposably" lived, just to wait a billion years to attack and cause havoc. Plus the fact the aliens died because of their immune systems... That was just a dumb way to end a movie. Oh, and who would have thought that Tom's son would surprising be alive to greet his father at the end? [/spoiler]

Like I said, at first I kind of liked the movie when it was over... Then after I was out of the theatre and thought about the movie more in depth... I was a bit disspointed about the ending and the story layout. True the special effects were kind of cool, but the story is what makes the movie good and that was faulty. I would suggest saving your money. There only seemed to be about 40mins of decent content in the movie... Well, that's my thought :P
"A merry heart doeth good like a medicine.." Prov 17:22

The word 'impossible' isn't in my dictionary... but I don't really have a dictionary you know? - Eikichi Onizuka.
Sorry, but I stop being a teacher at 5 o'clock. - Eikichi Onizuka.
User avatar
agasfas
 
Posts: 2341
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 7:27 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Postby Hitokiri » Sun Jul 03, 2005 12:13 pm

Anyone who hasn't seen it, please disregard my post...i'm just reply to Mangafanatics post and making my entir epost a spoiler tag would be redundant when it isnt exactly a spoiler.

Mangafanatic wrote:15 minutes of a lame and somewhat unexplained ending

Overall, I just thought the movie was all about special effects and it lacked the elements which would connect the audience with the characters. Additionally, there were just some "Um, and why is it that. . ." kind of stuff. Such as:
That's one of Speilberg's trademarks :lol:

[spoiler]At the beginning of the movie, everyone is getting vaporized by the aliens. Sudddenly, half way through, Mr. Spielberg must have decided that wasn't gruesome enough and he decided instead to make the alien suck blood. From then on, the aliens instead captured their prey and sucked the blood out of them. Nas.ty. So, why the crud was it that they changed suddenly?[/spoiler]


I think Speilberg introduced that just to provide a alternate and maybe more complex explanation on why the aliens invaded. Remember, Speilberg intended that this movie was through Ray's eyes...not through a narrators eyes (Morgan Freeeman = awesomeness). That's why we don't know what was the aliens doing...say in England unless Ray saw or heard about it. same goes for the ways of the aliens. All ray knows it has come to extinguish the human race and to protect his daughter and son with his life...which is awesome transistion from the starting to the movie to the end.

[spoiler] Okay, so the idea is that BILLIONS of years ago, before human life had even "evolved" on the planet's surface, the aliens planted these ships under our feet, ne? Well, so it turns out the aliens want our blood and that APPEARS to be the only reason that the creators of the film supply us with as a reason for this invasion of our planet. With that said, care to explain how it is that that works when there WEREN'T EVEN PEOPLE AROUND WHEN THE ALIEN PLANETED THEIR SHIPS HERE!?[/spoiler]


I thought of that too....I guess it will just remain a mystery to us.

One thing that is peeving me off is how everyone is like "It has a political motive". I'm like "Shut up and watch the freakin movie. Stop comparing everything to politics."

I want to see it again...I'm going to go see it with my parents sometime this week, then with my best friend an dhis girlfriend possibly, and then possibly with the youth group when they get back from there missions trip.
User avatar
Hitokiri
 
Posts: 3475
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Yatsushiro-shi, Kumamoto-ken

Postby the_lizardqueen » Sun Jul 03, 2005 4:30 pm

Random thought..
[spoiler]If the aliens had planted the tripods and such on earth a very, very long time ago, wouldn't they have brought some type of earth disease or bacteria back to their home planet?

I also had major issues with Ray's Ex, her new hubby and the grandparents being perfectly groomed in an undamaged house looking no worse for the wear. It would have been far more convincing for me if Ray had encountered them taking shelter in a tunnel, or even the ruins of their home..[/spoiler]
[color="lightgreen"]"There is an art, or rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."

-The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy[/color]
User avatar
the_lizardqueen
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 12:08 pm
Location: The Canadian prairies

Postby Ingemar » Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:55 pm

The case for:
Alien technology that would make Half-Life 2's Striders weep.

The case against:
Already well covered by everyone else. I think Spielberg ran out of ideas. And I found Tim Robbins' character completely unecessary.
Job 7:16

I loathe my life; I would not live forever. Let me alone, for my days are but a breath.
User avatar
Ingemar
 
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 12:43 pm
Location: A Dungeon

Postby Locke » Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:58 pm

Ingemar wrote:The case for:
Alien technology that would make Half-Life 2's Striders weep.

The case against:
Already well covered by everyone else. I think Spielberg ran out of ideas. And I found Tim Robbins' character completely unecessary.



Thats what I was thinking all th eway through the movie.

I was hoping for Freeman to come out with the gravity gun and save the day >.>
Secret Bumping Club Member #10 - geocities.com/arphage/sbc.html

When you find yourself in the company of a halfling and an ill-tempered
Dragon, remember, you do not have to outrun the Dragon...
...you just have to outrun the halfling.
User avatar
Locke
 
Posts: 3691
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 4:00 am
Location: SoCal

Postby HikariChan » Mon Jul 04, 2005 3:51 pm

Awesome movie XD


My mom does NOT go to college
:P
User avatar
HikariChan
 
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 10:00 am
Location: -Where I practice flying with my Imagination-Big Ol' Texas-

Postby Hitokiri » Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:39 pm

the_lizardqueen wrote:Random thought..
[spoiler]If the aliens had planted the tripods and such on earth a very, very long time ago, wouldn't they have brought some type of earth disease or bacteria back to their home planet?

I also had major issues with Ray's Ex, her new hubby and the grandparents being perfectly groomed in an undamaged house looking no worse for the wear. It would have been far more convincing for me if Ray had encountered them taking shelter in a tunnel, or even the ruins of their home..[/spoiler]


I totally agree...I didn't like the ending...it was too happy >o<
User avatar
Hitokiri
 
Posts: 3475
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Yatsushiro-shi, Kumamoto-ken

Postby Sesshoumaru » Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:09 am

:shady:

*Holds head*

TIME TO CRACK SOME SKULLS!!!



At the beginning of the movie, everyone is getting vaporized by the aliens. Sudddenly, half way through, Mr. Spielberg must have decided that wasn't gruesome enough and he decided instead to make the alien suck blood. From then on, the aliens instead captured their prey and sucked the blood out of them. Nas.ty. So, why the crud was it that they changed suddenly?
You're kidding right? it wasn't changed, the aliens either use huyman blood as a fuel source or drink it themselves. Not rocket science. OR it is VERY possible they'll use the blood to further study us for whatever reason. This is a race of intelligent beings God knows how many times more advanced than ours.











Okay, so the idea is that BILLIONS of years ago, before human life had even "evolved" on the planet's surface, the aliens planted these ships under our feet, ne? Well, so it turns out the aliens want our blood and that APPEARS to be the only reason that the creators of the film supply us with as a reason for this invasion of our planet. With that said, care to explain how it is that that works when there WEREN'T EVEN PEOPLE AROUND WHEN THE ALIEN PLANETED THEIR SHIPS HERE!?
Did you even pay attention to Morgan Freeman's narration?

"While mankind busied himself with his various concerns, our planet was being watched by intelligences far greater than ours. Silently they watched and waited. Studying our every behavior. Soon these intellects viewed our planet with envious eyes and silently they made their plans against us.

Then Ray's chat with the old man: "They've been planning this for a million years, these were only the first they'll keep coming. This is not a war between the two races, this is an extermination"

That sums everything up: The aliens regarded our race as insignificant and useless. Then made plan to not just invade but destroy us. They were going to kill the human race off for whatever reasons. Maybe use our planet for their race and their further advancement who knows the SPECIFIC reason they wanted to kill us off. But they just wanted us eliminated.








The fact the aliens planted the ships before humans "supposably" lived, just to wait a billion years to attack and cause havoc. Plus the fact the aliens died because of their immune systems... That was just a dumb way to end a movie. Oh, and who would have thought that Tom's son would surprising be alive to greet his father at the end?
Did you evenr ead the book/ the aliens die of bacterial infections. What? you thought the movie would end like ID4 where everything is completely blown up and destroyed? how could that be? pay attention and remember. These beings are THOUSANDS perhaps MILLIONS of times more advanced than ours. You really think we could nuke them and that would be that. They planted the Tripods and watched and recorded and studied EVERY aspect of human life and behavior. They knew how to combat and beat us.








And to top it off, there was little to no character development
What ARE you talking about? the first Tripod that rises is a taste of character development. Notice how quickly Ray went from a slacking, care free iresponsible dead beat. To a highly concerned and caring father who did not even think about his own safety but his primary goal was to get his kids safely to their mother. As well as the peanut butter sandwich scene, AND don't forget when the mob hijacked their car. Look how viciously Ray fought them off to protect his daughter, he went to the point of using a gun to threaten them off. THAT's real character development, just because the characters didn't sit around each other all fancied up while sipping a cup of tea saying "Oh how was your day my love?" doesn't mean there's no character development.
Image
User avatar
Sesshoumaru
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 10:00 am
Location: Buh buh buh buh buh BROOOOKLYN

Postby Ashley » Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:31 am

Forgive me for not reading any of the prior posts (lest I spoil something for myself) but can anyone tell me how scary/suspenseful this movie is? I wanted to go see it, but...I'm really, really sensitive to that sort of thing. If you could compare it to a recent movie, that'd be very helpful. Thanks guys!
Image
User avatar
Ashley
 
Posts: 7364
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 10:00 am
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Postby the_lizardqueen » Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:39 am

Ashley wrote:Forgive me for not reading any of the prior posts (lest I spoil something for myself) but can anyone tell me how scary/suspenseful this movie is? I wanted to go see it, but...I'm really, really sensitive to that sort of thing. If you could compare it to a recent movie, that'd be very helpful. Thanks guys!

I didn't find it to be too bad. And I typically can't stand horror movies, they leave me sleeping with the light on. WoTW definitely had some tense scenes, but I don't remember too many made-ya-jumps. There are alot of loud disconcerting noises and scenes of mass destruction though, and some of the scenes are a bit disturbing (though not terribly graphic). Overall, I'd say it's kinda similar in violence and intensity to Jurrasic Park, but in a bigger setting with more destruction.
[color="lightgreen"]"There is an art, or rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."

-The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy[/color]
User avatar
the_lizardqueen
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 12:08 pm
Location: The Canadian prairies

Next

Return to General Entertainment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 355 guests