Postby HisaishiFan » Sun Jun 19, 2005 7:28 pm
WOOT! I am glad we are talking about the movie. I just got back from seeing it and am bursting with questions. I thought that the one of the main ideas of the movie was that there are good ways and bad ways to give your heart to someone. It also showed the the transforming power of redemptive love. I really enjoyed seeing the movie the first time, but I'll probably need to see it a few more times to really get my brain around it! Okay, on to the discussion. . . .
Question about Calcifer and Howl:
[spoiler]I think Howl could have given something other than his heart to Califer to help him live. Look what happened when Sophie gave just her hair to Calcifer! She knew it would be foolish to give Calcifer her eyes or her heart, even though he asked for them. I think that Howl gave Calcifer the wrong kind of thing (his heart) because Howl wanted something wrongly: he wanted the power to transform himself into a strong and beautiful creature, and he wanted the power to move his castle. But the fruition of Howl's desires came at great personal cost to both Howl and Calcifer, they became enslaved to each other. Calcifer couldn't leave the castle and Howl began turning into a beast.[/spoiler]
More on giving away your heart:
[spoiler]It wasn't just Calcifer and Howl that gave their hearts away for the wrong reasons. The Witch of the Waste did, too. She wanted a young love. She wanted Howl's heart for herself and almost killed Calcifer to get it, when she realized that Calcifer had it. Not only would she have died when Calcifer died and the Castle fell apart, but Caclifer and Howl would have died too. Only Sophie, who sacrifically loved them all (even the witch), was able to redeem them from the results of these disasterous choices. Sophie could have kicked the Witch of the Waste when she was down (literally, she could have kicked her down Suliman's steps), but she didn't even though she had good reason to (the curse). Instead, when she realized how much pain the witch was in, she tried ot encourage her by cheering her on. And when the witch was reduced to a wreck of her former self, Sophie fed her, took care of her and loved her into health. It changed the witch's life. She became Grandmother. Ultimately, she gave back Howl's heart/Calcifer because of Sophie's love.[/spoiler]
Freedom at the end:
[spoiler]Could it be that Sophie is able to free both Howl and Calcifer because she sacrificially loves them both and they both love and trust her? She is willing to possibly die herself, to go into the unknown world of the Dream Door, to save them both. She puts their safety above her own. Because of this, I think she is the only one who can give Howl back his heart without killing Calcifer.[/spoiler]
The question about Sophie and her transformations:
[spoiler]I'm not sure that Sophie, when waking, actually is reverting back to her original self. I think that perhaps Howl sees her true self as he comes to love her and begins to value her more than himself. He doesn't always see her as beautiful (for example, in the flower field). It does seem that when Sophie's emotions of love showing strongly--when she is trying to protect Howl or the Witch of th Waste or help Heen--that others begin to glimpse the young Sophie (although her hair stays silver). These displays of emotion make Sophie physically stronger, too. Loving rightly makes her stronger. It is very interesting to me because it is similar to what happenes to Porco Rosso. We never find out why Porco became a pig, but whenever he goes beyond himself to help others, some of his pigginess disappears.[/spoiler]
And what is a family?
[spoiler]I thought it was interesting that one of the movie's strongest ideas was that a family is made up, not of your birth family necessarily, but of the people who love you and stand by you. Sophie's own mother was too busy too be a mom; she was off shopping for new hats, dating men and marrying instead of taking care of Sophie. She sold her out for Suliman. Sophie's sister (who seemed sweet) was more interested in men and seeing the world than in helping her Sophie, who was trying to stay true to her father's memory by running the hat shop, even though she didn't really like making hats. Sophie stuck with it because she loved her dad. The people that ended up being a family, except Markl, are all redeemed by the power of Sophie's love: Howl, the Witch of the Waste, Calcifer, and Turnip (although he returns to his own kingdom stop the war.) Markle is the only person who isn't redeemed in the since of being changed from darkness to light. But Markl, with simple, child-like faith, trusts Sophie and accepts her as his sister or mom.[/spoiler]
I thought the movie was rich with complex and mature themes. I didn't agree with Roger Ebert's review at all. In fact, I wondered if he and I had seen the same movie. He says Howl's Moving Caslte is overly long and that not much happens in it, but it seems to me like quite a lot happens in character development and adventure. Another thing makes me wonder if Ebert and I saw the same move: He describes Suliman as a "grotesque sorceress . . . who reminds us of Yubaba, the sorceress who ran the floating bathhouse in 'Spirited Away.'" Suliman looked absolutely nothing like Yubaba. She was a beautiful older woman, who was drawn proportionally like a real woman. Ebert also said that he grew weary waiting for the movie to end, whereas I couldn't believe how quickly two hours few by. I wonder if some of Ebert's negative reaction came from seeing the dubbed version first rather than the subbed version. I thought the voices were perfect in the Japanese version. (John Lassiter supervised the dubbing, though, and he respects Miyazaki greatly, so I think he would have done his best to do a good job.)
Another review that bugged me was one that said Howl's Moving Castle was "an overly familiar affair that will strain young attention spans with its plodding lessons about greed (it's bad) and nature (it's good)." Hello? Again, did we see the same movie? I suppose Howl's was tangentially about the hunger for power (greed), but "nature is good?" Howl's Moving Castle didn't talk about nature or the environment at all. The backstory was about how cruel and useless wars are, especially when based upon a ruler's desires for excitement. But the main focus of the movie was about what happens when you give you heart away for the wrong reasons, what true love is, and how love makes a family.
I don't get the difference between what the reviewers saw and what I saw!
Ah, well!
Short addendum - The Hisaishi core was hautingly beautiful, of course. I just won an E-Bay auction for the piano score. I can't wait for it to get here!
But even if we don't feel at ease, God is greater than our feelings and He knows everything. 1 John 3:20
Delight in utter trust.