Tenshi no Ai wrote:if the girl's outside and says "I'm cold" it can mean "I'm cold and want a hug" sort of thing.
Zelda27 wrote:Well, if she was what would you say?
There's lots of other situations too. The point is, in none of those situations would I think about hugging her. My logical engineer brain would be more concerned with solving her problem of being cold than considering a display of affection.
CreatureArt wrote:Maybe it's one of those differences between girls and guys - that guys tend to be more logical and want to solve a girl's problems rather than get vague hints of what's going on and nothing outright? What do you all think?
uc pseudonym wrote:I think that you might have pointed out a vague trend, but that it is dangerous to form opinions about people simply because of their gender. On the other hand, I would say that expecting anyone to take vague hints is a bad idea unless you know them fairly well. People leave hints in so vastly different ways that generally you're wasting your time.
christianfriend wrote:um....
1: he must be a very stron believer in god..
2:He must love me(duh)
3:I would like him to be very humorious
4:He likes to do very different stuff
5: He need s to be himself
6:He isn't very aggresive, and doesnt like to fight
7:must be good with animals!
8:um..if he does like anime..GREAT..but if he doesnt...its fine..
9: I would like him to be outgoing
Umm..so..yeah..
kaemmerite wrote:Well, to be honest, that depends on the context. For example, when it's 70 out my mom is cold. So, if it was 70 and my girlfriend said, "I'm cold," I would respond, "It's not cold, it feels nice out." If we were in Michigan or Canada or something and she said, "It's cold," I'd say, "What do you expect? It's the north." If we were outside of our house doing something, I would say, "Well, if you're cold then go inside."
There's lots of other situations too. The point is, in none of those situations would I think about hugging her. My logical engineer brain would be more concerned with solving her problem of being cold than considering a display of affection.
uc pseudonym wrote:You take me too literally, anonymous.
A word about everyone who listed looks (and I paint with a broad brush). Such a transient trait. Look at pictures of your parents years ago... most of the time they look incredibly different. Some couples I know have four or five different phases, during each of which their appearances totally change. Think about it honestly... your body starts going downhill (in an overall sense) at about age 40. Assuming you intend to live a while, you could spend two thirds of your life with your spouse deteriorating, every day becoming less than you once were, leading up toward inevitable death. Most people lose their looks quickly, even faster if the other person has youthful standards (as most youth today do). The merest fraction of anyone's marraige will be with a person who looks the same as they did on the day of marraige... excepting movie stars, who divorce people every lunch break or so.
John316 wrote:I would agree with this, except for the fact that I would like my children to be somewhat good-looking. Sad as it is, good-looking people are more likely to succeed in the world. So because of this, I would include looks in my criteria for selecting a mate.
John316 wrote:I would agree with this, except for the fact that I would like my children to be somewhat good-looking. Sad as it is, good-looking people are more likely to succeed in the world. So because of this, I would include looks in my criteria for selecting a mate.
uc pseudonym wrote:That is quoted from some time ago. I would hope that we do not go excessively into the issue again, but...
My original point was that the criterion of looks will either be
1) entirely subjective (in which case you only mean that the person is beautiful to you and I have no problem with it)
2) irrelevant in a few years
That is, looks change greatly over time, and hence that criterion seems (to myself, personally) to be a fairly unimportant criterion compared to other, less transient, factors.
mechana2015 wrote:oh wonderful... post 666 for me X-[
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 132 guests