“
How to Stay Christian in College” by J. Budziszewski
I have slightly non-traditional views about the church and how it is supposed to function. This, of course, seems to worry everyone around me. The direct result of all of this good-natured yet ill-founded worry is that I get sent a lot of these kinds of books. I don't particularly mind receiving these things –if nothing else they prove that someone cares about me-- but I do have to say that the majority of them are quite insipid, shallow, and unhelpful. Surprisingly, this one bucked the trend.
As is standard in this genre, the author (who hasn't been a student for many years) tries to imagine what it might be like to be a college student in this day and age, and then goes about attempting to help them work through these difficulties and moral crises in a fashion that would be considered acceptable given the current standards of Christian culture. Where this book sets itself apart, however, is by actually talking with students of the day, actually discussing relevant issues, and actually acknowledging that Christian culture is a complex thing with many varying levels of belief. In other words, it is a much more applicable and credible guide to college life than any others of its type that I have read.
The content itself isn't bad either. It goes over all of the big issues; how the world began, how to deal with drugs, romantic relationships, philosophical pitfalls, etc., and offers fairly typical and solid answers to each --even quoting a few of my favorite authors in the process. Where “How to Stay Christian in College” eventually runs into issues is with its shallowness. Since it attempts to cover so many topics, it can only barely discusses each issue. It offers many pat answers, but rarely any responses to the obvious rebuttals to those pat answers. In short, a not unhelpful guide that hopefully makes the reader curious enough to start deeper studies.
7/10.
Atria35 wrote:^ Most of these I'm already familiar with- again, history buff. I study it in my spare time. It's just that I'm so familiar with the traditional Atlantis stories (and theories and etc.- I've also read a few archeological tracts on possibilities of where/when it actually was), that I don't care for where he particularly places it. Or when. It just doesn't jive for me, since British history is my forte.
It's an interesting take, but one that I'm just not fond of.
Fair enough. Personally I prefer the unique take on the story, as opposed to it being just another Malory derivation, but to each his (or her) own, I suppose.