Oh God this movie was just amazing. It's like a friggen meta-movie.
Everyone needs to read these two interpretations. They're VERY interesting.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1375666/board/nest/167024711[spoiler]The idea of 'Inception' is to be a story crafted in the architecture of the mind - Cobb's mind. What people perceive to be real isn't necessarily so, because the mind can make things appear to be as real as ever. An important thing to remember is the start of the film. Dom Cobb wakes up in a place that we later find out to be limbo – more importantly, Saito's limbo.
What happens next is something that is meaningless the first time a viewer watches the film. Saito is seen handling Cobb's totem (which was a top that he took from Mal while in limbo). At first, this is meaningless. Upon a second viewing, the viewer should realize that everything that happens after this scene (the jump cut to Cobb's attempt at extracting information from Saito, and so on) is something much deeper.
Saito promises to give Cobb the one thing that he wants, and that's to find the way back home. How does he convince Cobb to do this? He tells him to "take a leap of faith." This is another line that goes unnoticed at first. On a second viewing, the viewer should remember that line as something that Mal told Cobb when she jumped off of the building. Is the picture becoming clearer yet?
Cobb seems to appear wherever he needs to go, whether it is Paris, or Mombasa, just like it were a dream. While in Mombasa, Cobb gets chased by anonymous agents (which he perceives to be Cobol agents) through a fantastic action sequence where Cobb escapes the dream-like narrow tunnel and is rescued by none other than Saito. A bit later, Cobb and Saito visit Yusef who brings them into a basement with various figures connected to the dream machine. The idea was for Cobb to experiment with the deep sedative. He does, and when he "wakes up" he tries to use his totem only to be interrupted by Saito. Cobb never does find out if he is in the real world or not. In fact, he hasn’t been yet. He’s been in limbo ever since he got there with Mal. Ever since then, he's been going deeper and deeper to the point where he created Saito as a projection to help him "get back home" - Did you really think Saito can just pick up the phone and make murder charges disappear? No. But, Cobb believes it and thus Saito is used to thrust Cobb further and further into a state of limbo – where at the end of the journey, Cobb truly believes he is with his children after confronting and getting over his projection of Mal.
While in the limbo, Cobb, using Mal's totem, put the idea in her head that she was in the dream world. She was, she just hadn’t realized it yet. What the viewer forgets is that all knowledge of limbo comes from Cobb's character. To think that Cobb is 100% accurate about it is absolutely wrong. He wouldn't know dream from reality – not in the limbo that he describes to people – and definitely not if inception were performed on him to believe that limbo truly was the real world.
Mal and Cobb never really left limbo at least, not that layer of it. When Mal jumped off the building, she gave herself the very same "kick" that Ariadne improvised later on in the movie. Mal was right about still being in the dream world. Cobb was still engulfed in limbo and didn't realize it. When Cobb and Mal had killed themselves with the train, they simply moved one layer deeper just like Saito did when he was killed, Fischer did when he was killed, and so on (this happens again at the end of the film when Saito picks up the gun in front of Cobb).
Cobb, deep in limbo, unknowingly uses the projections of his team to keep going deeper and deeper until the idea of inception is performed on his mind, and he truly believes he was able to find a way back home. Saito's promise to Cobb was kept - in the form of Saito (a projection from Cobb) making sure that Cobb ended up in limbo, so that he could live his "life" with his kids (who are in the same position as they were all throughout the film).
The team were projections in Cobb's mind the entire time. It's how he was able to go to Miles in Paris and find an architect named Ariadne (a name which comes from a Greek mythology story about a labyrinth) who improvised the "kick" at the end of the movie the same way that Cobb had seen (but not accepted as a dream) Mal do previously when she jumped off the building. It's how Eames happened to know of Yusef, and so on and so forth. Everything Cobb needed to make this inception work happened to work out for him. It's even how Cobb's lawyer knew so quickly that Mal had gone to 3 different shrinks to be declared "sane" and how he happened to have two tickets for Cobb to be able to get out of the country before the police would have arrested him.
The movie ends with Cobb appearing from place to place, going from limbo with Saito, to the plane where Saito magically makes one phone call to free Cobb from his problems, to walking through the airport, to meeting Miles who is with Cobb's children. Cobb spins his totem and it spins just like it was a dream. He fixes his eyes on his children and the totem begins to lose speed – this is because inception has worked – Cobb truly believes he is in the real world. His totem will not spin like it did in the dream, not as long as he has his kids. The title of the film is now shown to us, making complete sense because the title was really Cobb's journey through his own mind: INCEPTION[/spoiler]
And this:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1375666/board/nest/167044617?p=1[spoiler]All of these theories hinge on things we are told by Cobb, who may in fact be an unreliable narrator trapped in a limbo deeper than anyone could even realize they are in. I don't think that anyone in the world of the movie (or Cobb's mind, potentially) knows how deep the mind actually goes. It's all theoretical and undefined. There is disagreement that a 3rd level dream is even possible without everything breaking down (according to Yusef who may only be a projection of Cobb's subconscious). Basically, the "rules" of the dream world are so loosely defined that the door is left wide open to interpretation of the film.
Anyways, the theory about the Totem system even WORKING is all according to Cobb, who says that Mal came up with the idea. Cobb says he uses hers after she died, but we NEVER EVER EVER see COBB's original Totem. This could be a major hint that he has lost all concept of reality.
Maybe once you have been at the deep level that Mal and Cobb were, you will very likely feel that you have returned to reality once you "die", and henceforth believe that your Totem will behave normally (thus constructing its behavior like any other part of a dream). Mal, however, was able to realize that they were still in a false reality, unlike Cobb who had already lost his mind. Eventually Mal kills herself, but Cobb is too scared to jump also. So he carries on using her totem and puts all of his FAITH in the totem's ability to prove his reality.
He is actually manifesting its "realistic" behavior, and thus falsely reinforcing his notion that he in in reality. The Totem is his ultimate form of Inception because he continually reinforces himself using it, whereas the totem itself is just an object that behaves the way he believes it will.The scene where Saito interrupts Cobb's totem spin is a big hint, but doesn't even matter in the larger scheme of the story. The totem can spin or fall, yet ultimately prove nothing.[/spoiler]
Also, my own two cents.
[spoiler]Notice the very end. Because (as far as I am concerned) whether or not the top falls or not is totally irrelevant, it doesn't prove anything. The audience was fixated on the wrong thing at the end. What's really important to note at the end are the kids. They seem to be outside. The scene is identical to Cobb's memories of his kids. Same size. Same clothes. Same everything. This time they only look towards him because he believes he is home. But no. This is Cobb in his final limbo.[/spoiler]
Hohenheim wrote:A quick aside is that some of the themes reminded me of The Matrix. Don't get me wrong, this was definitely a unique creation from the mind of Christopher Nolan, it's just that I noticed a sort of resonance. In fact, philosophically speaking, one might say that The Matrix asks a question that Inception attempts to answer. May it be said that I found Nolan's answer to be satisfying and enriching.
[spoiler]Ah yes, the Brain in the vat. The whole "subjectivity of reality". How do we know that our current reality is really true reality? What if we're just a brain in the vat?[/spoiler]
SO YES. FANTASTIC MOVIE. Interpretable on so many levels. GOOD GOD this movie was just top-notch. Nolan did not fail to deliver.
