Kaori (post: 1403369) wrote: Macbeth is from the outset the most villainous of Shakespeare’s heroes, at least out of the plays I have personally read. He is driven by ambition from the very beginning, when the witches hail him as the future king and he asks them to tell him more, rather than rebuking them as a loyal subject ought.
Hmm, I suppose that's true. I guess I never really thought Macbeth to be extremely villainous because I subconsciously considered those who are driven by hatred or personal vendettas to be villains, but I suppose that the true villains are those like Macbeth: Easily persuaded to do wrong, overly greedy, and backstabbing. When you have a villain that only fights against the protagonist because he feels he was wrong and is trying to right it, there is still a heroism in their character. But with characters like Macbeth (or Wormtoung from LOTR), there is true treachery.
Kaori (post: 1403369) wrote: Hmm, without an annotated edition handy, and not having read the play for a few years, my best guess would be that Banquo does, in fact, have descendants that will eventually become kings, probably in some sort of pseudo-historical sense, but not quite yet. The witches do say that he will beget kings]uc pseudonym (post: 1403462) wrote:The character Banquo was partially based on a historical figure of the same name. Today there is debate about this that I don't exactly remember, but the people of Shakespeare's time believed Banquo was an ancestor of the House of Stuart. James I was part of that line, so the sisters are likely referencing the current kings. On that note, historical sources suggest that the real Banquo was an accomplice to the murder.
I see. Thank you both for your replies, I wondered if that might be the case, but I had expected for Banquo's son to play a larger role in the play and was disappointed to see he had not. I thought perhaps that Shakespeare had just forgotten about that prophesy or something. After reading Romeo and Juliet and throughly disliking it, I have a tendency to look for errors in Shakespeare's work. I didn't know that Banquo was based off a real person, though, I'll have to look that up.Kaori (post: 1403369) wrote:As for my own reading, I have just finished The Ball and the Cross by G.K. Chesterton, which combines the stunningly beautiful prose styling of Conrad or Emerson with all the scintillating wit of Wilde. Also just began reading The Pilgrim’s Regress by C.S. Lewis] The Ball and the Cross[/I] highly; kudos to ich1990 for recommending this book particularly and to bigsleepj for very probably influencing my decision to read The Man Who Was Thursday a few years ago (my introduction to Chesterton).
The Ball and the Cross is one of my favorite books by my favorite writer. Chesterton's mix of almost dreamy descriptions of places and people and his rather blunt and hilarious views on humanity and society I find refreshing. I'd love to re-read it, but I lent my copy to my humanities this last semester and haven't seen it since. I would, as I've said, recommend the Father Brown series, they're a very fun read, and are short, so I'll read a story or two during lunch break.
Also, about your The Importance of Being Earnest question, [spoiler] Although it isn't explicitly stated in the end, I always had just assumed that Algernon is christened as Earnest afterwards. After all, that is where both Jack and Algernon were going to do before they were interrupted by Lady Bracknell. [/spoiler]