Nate (post: 1281127) wrote:I have a feeling a lot of people in this thread are using underrated to mean "really awesome games that everyone who has played them loves but you probably don't know about it."
Which isn't what underrated means. I mean, come on, practically EVERYBODY who's played Okami loves it. It's sold quite well. Earthbound? Who DOESN'T love Earthbound? That's not underrated in the least. Trauma Center? Densetsu no Stafy? PLEASE. I haven't seen a bad review of those anywhere.
People. Underrated. Emphasis on RATED. If a game gets glowing review scores, it's NOT underrated! Here's a good example of an underrated game:
Wild Arms: Alter Code F.
Which didn't do very good with the critics at all.
Come on, I know you guys can do it! Use words for their intended meaning! Quit posting games that everyone praises and loves but are just not well known! There's already a thread for that. This thread is for underrated games.
goldenspines (post: 1281199) wrote:I don't play many video games, but I think Pong is very underrated. No one ever discusses that game anymore. 8(
goldenspines wrote:Its only stealing if you don't get caught.
Peanut (post: 1281243) wrote:Clearly you haven't taken the time to discuss it with intellectuals at the college level. While just yesterday Ryan and I had a nice chat about the symbolism within the game of pong. You see, each of the paddles represents their respective player and the ball represents a question or idea which they are contesting. But the ball doesn't just represent any idea or question, but the central idea and question that all men wrestle with in life and that's a question of meaning. What are we supposed to do? Are we meant for greater things? When a person scores it is symbolic of them achieving something that brings meaning to their life at the cost of someone else's failure. And they recieve a point which symbolizes the climb to higher goals. It's really a very deep and thought provoking game. If I had time I would seriously consider writting several books on it and even then I wouldn't be able to touch on all the intricacies of that game.
Peanut (post: 1281243) wrote:Clearly you haven't taken the time to discuss it with intellectuals at the college level. While just yesterday Ryan and I had a nice chat about the symbolism within the game of pong. You see, each of the paddles represents their respective player and the ball represents a question or idea which they are contesting. But the ball doesn't just represent any idea or question, but the central idea and question that all men wrestle with in life and that's a question of meaning. What are we supposed to do? Are we meant for greater things? When a person scores it is symbolic of them achieving something that brings meaning to their life at the cost of someone else's failure. And they recieve a point which symbolizes the climb to higher goals. It's really a very deep and thought provoking game. If I had time I would seriously consider writting several books on it and even then I wouldn't be able to touch on all the intricacies of that game.
Peanut (post: 1281243) wrote:Clearly you haven't taken the time to discuss it with intellectuals at the college level. While just yesterday Ryan and I had a nice chat about the symbolism within the game of pong. You see, each of the paddles represents their respective player and the ball represents a question or idea which they are contesting. But the ball doesn't just represent any idea or question, but the central idea and question that all men wrestle with in life and that's a question of meaning. What are we supposed to do? Are we meant for greater things? When a person scores it is symbolic of them achieving something that brings meaning to their life at the cost of someone else's failure. And they recieve a point which symbolizes the climb to higher goals. It's really a very deep and thought provoking game. If I had time I would seriously consider writting several books on it and even then I wouldn't be able to touch on all the intricacies of that game.
And yet, regardless of the score, the game does not change. The chief scenario remains in fixed equilibrium, despite any dexterity or luck on the part of one or both of its key players. Whether 50 to 50 or 100 to 0, the game simply recycles its environment in a crude homeostasis, never concluding, never finally rewarding the success or failure of those involved, but continuing, completely indifferent to them. In this light the game can easily be considered a satire of the futility of material achievement, and arguably a deconstruction of the American Dream. The darkest (and most popular) interpretations border on a dismissal of any conscious effort to succeed in life, even on a personal standard of the self, as everything inevitably returns to the zero point with no consideration for the alleged progress or competition of either party.Peanut (post: 1281243) wrote:Clearly you haven't taken the time to discuss it with intellectuals at the college level. While just yesterday Ryan and I had a nice chat about the symbolism within the game of pong. You see, each of the paddles represents their respective player and the ball represents a question or idea which they are contesting. But the ball doesn't just represent any idea or question, but the central idea and question that all men wrestle with in life and that's a question of meaning. What are we supposed to do? Are we meant for greater things? When a person scores it is symbolic of them achieving something that brings meaning to their life at the cost of someone else's failure. And they recieve a point which symbolizes the climb to higher goals. It's really a very deep and thought provoking game. If I had time I would seriously consider writting several books on it and even then I wouldn't be able to touch on all the intricacies of that game.
Nate (post: 1281127) wrote:Come on, I know you guys can do it! Use words for their intended meaning! Quit posting games that everyone praises and loves but are just not well known! There's already a thread for that. This thread is for underrated games.
Peanut (post: 1281243) wrote:Clearly you haven't taken the time to discuss it with intellectuals at the college level. While just yesterday Ryan and I had a nice chat about the symbolism within the game of pong. You see, each of the paddles represents their respective player and the ball represents a question or idea which they are contesting. But the ball doesn't just represent any idea or question, but the central idea and question that all men wrestle with in life and that's a question of meaning. What are we supposed to do? Are we meant for greater things? When a person scores it is symbolic of them achieving something that brings meaning to their life at the cost of someone else's failure. And they recieve a point which symbolizes the climb to higher goals. It's really a very deep and thought provoking game. If I had time I would seriously consider writting several books on it and even then I wouldn't be able to touch on all the intricacies of that game.
Fish and Chips (post: 1281273) wrote:And yet, regardless of the score, the game does not change. The chief scenario remains in fixed equilibrium, despite any dexterity or luck on the part of one or both of its key players. Whether 50 to 50 or 100 to 0, the game simply recycles its environment in a crude homeostasis, never concluding, never finally rewarding the success or failure of those involved, but continuing, completely indifferent to them. In this light the game can easily be considered a satire of the futility of material achievement, and arguably a deconstruction of the American Dream. The darkest (and most popular) interpretations border on a dismissal of any conscious effort to succeed in life, even on a personal standard of the self, as everything inevitably returns to the zero point with no consideration for the alleged progress or competition of either party.
Several scholars cite these subliminal nihilist undertones as the central reason preventing Pong from taking a more prominent place in the comparably optimistic gaming culture of the modern era.
ich1990 (post: 1281316) wrote:What about "Nate's Life: The Game", would that count? It was blasted by critics, and is, admittedly, unpolished. Nonetheless, when you get used to its quirky style it grows on you. It is a shame it isn't very accessible because its has some interesting social commentary. I am afraid most people will throw out the baby with the bathwater, so to speak.
goldenspines (post: 1281326) wrote:While on that subject, I rather liked that game. Interesting plot line, cleverly thought up, but the boss battles were a headache. :p
Hopping back on topic, a rather underrated game(in my opinion) was Sonic Shuffle for the Dreamcast. Sure, it was exactly like a toned down version of Mario Party, but I still liked it. It wasn't received the best though.
RidleyofZebes (post: 1281028) wrote:Riviera: the Promised Land and it's 2 spin-off games. Mostly overlooked, but incredible gems. I've never seen any other games like them.
ADXC (post: 1281317) wrote:Wow you guys are very intellectual. I can't even begin to say how glad that I am able to read two such well learned and educational posts. Never will this ever happen again, well at least not for another decade.
Peanut (post: 1281243) wrote:Clearly you haven't taken the time to discuss it with intellectuals at the college level. While just yesterday Ryan and I had a nice chat about the symbolism within the game of pong. You see, each of the paddles represents their respective player and the ball represents a question or idea which they are contesting. But the ball doesn't just represent any idea or question, but the central idea and question that all men wrestle with in life and that's a question of meaning. What are we supposed to do? Are we meant for greater things? When a person scores it is symbolic of them achieving something that brings meaning to their life at the cost of someone else's failure. And they recieve a point which symbolizes the climb to higher goals. It's really a very deep and thought provoking game. If I had time I would seriously consider writting several books on it and even then I wouldn't be able to touch on all the intricacies of that game.
Nate (post: 1281196) wrote:Final Fantasy 7 is the most underrated game in history.
ilikegir33 wrote:Unlimited SaGa
Nate (post: 1281825) wrote:Wait...you LIKED Unlimited SaGa?
I thought...I thought it was just a rumor that anyone could like a game so universally horrible. Oh geez...I think I need to sit down...seriously...my world has just been shattered.
Maybe ghosts are real too, and Bigfoot, and psychics...this changes EVERYTHING. ><
ilikegir33 wrote:There's nothing wrong with Unlimited SaGa except for the voice acting and difficulty level.
I like challenge in my RPGs.
Nate (post: 1282216) wrote:I could go on about how the SaGa series is a blight on humanity but eh, not worth it since everyone who's even remotely familiar with games knows they're garbage.
Fish and Chips (post: 1281273) wrote:And yet, regardless of the score, the game does not change. The chief scenario remains in fixed equilibrium, despite any dexterity or luck on the part of one or both of its key players. Whether 50 to 50 or 100 to 0, the game simply recycles its environment in a crude homeostasis, never concluding, never finally rewarding the success or failure of those involved, but continuing, completely indifferent to them. In this light the game can easily be considered a satire of the futility of material achievement, and arguably a deconstruction of the American Dream. The darkest (and most popular) interpretations border on a dismissal of any conscious effort to succeed in life, even on a personal standard of the self, as everything inevitably returns to the zero point with no consideration for the alleged progress or competition of either party.
Several scholars cite these subliminal nihilist undertones as the central reason preventing Pong from taking a more prominent place in the comparably optimistic gaming culture of the modern era.
Return to Video Games and VG Reviews
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests