Mithrandir (post: 1233924) wrote:Our local radio personality (who reviews movies for a living) gave it a solid meh. Apparently this person believes that the characterization and setting are good, but writing is only kinda OK.
Nate (post: 1234144) wrote:Regardless of how good this movie is, motion picture companies won't stop overusing CG until they stop making money. Thus, while I'd like to see this one, I am withholding my money until producers learn that regular animation still exists.
Ashley (post: 1234211) wrote:And these are...?
beau99 (post: 1234147) wrote:There is actually 2-D traditional animation used at the beginning of the film.
XxMelodyxX (post: 1237008) wrote:[color="DarkRed"] I like that movie I hope they make a sequel! I mean Dream Works has a Madgascar sequel coming out soon![/color]
KhakiBlueSocks wrote:"I'm going to make you a prayer request you can't refuse..." Cue the violins.
Radical Dreamer (post: 1233993) wrote:That's exactly what I heard from my state newspaper, and it's the feeling I get from the previews, too. Judging by my experience with most animated features today, Pixar's films are the only ones I want to spend my money on, so I think I'll be skipping out of this one and wait for Wall-E on the 27th. XD
beau99 (post: 1234222) wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_princess_and_the_frog
I was slightly mistaken. This one will be.
The two after that (Rapunzel, and King of the Elves) will be computer-animated, but they will have animation that resembles traditional animation so much, you can't tell the difference.
Rapunzel was going to be traditionally-animated at last check, though I guess they decided not to for some reason.
Return to General Entertainment
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 353 guests