Super Smash Brothers Brawl

Have a video game or or VG review? This is the place to to discuss it! We also accept discussions of board games and the like, but SHHH! Don't tell anyone, OK?

Postby Felix » Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:45 pm

Sorry for the double post, but I have another update. It looks like Donkey Kong has been added to the official character roster. This isn't really a surprise, but I thought it was mentionable.

Also, we need to get some speculation going as to who the other new characters will be (I know this ground has been covered a million times, but still...) and who we would like to see in the game.

Some of my speculations are...

I think there should be a Wolf-Link + Midna character. Maybe it could even be a transformation for Link, like how Zelda transforms into sheik, and how Samus turns into Zero suit Samus.
Even more interesting would be transformations for some of the other characters. Like a raccoon suit transformation for Mario, or something like that.

I also think it would be cool (if Ganondorf is in the game) if he transforms into Ganon for his final smash or whatnot, like how bowser turns into Giga bowser.

... I also think pirhana plants would be cool as an assist trophy. They could spring up in pipes from the ground and chomp your enemies :D Ooh! Speaking of 'chomp', Chain Chomp would be another cool assist trophy. Or even an item that you pick up, like the sledgehammer, and it follows you around for a while and bites people.

Also... I think it would be cool if they made goomba as a playable character... as a joke. And all you can do is move left and right... that's it.
User avatar
Felix
 
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:00 am
Location: Unemployed in Greenland

Postby Mr. SmartyPants » Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:46 pm

I hope Ganondorf isn't a Captain Falcon clone and has his own moveset.
User avatar
Mr. SmartyPants
 
Posts: 12541
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 9:00 am

Postby Felix » Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:47 pm

I can't find you a direct quote, but I believe that Sakurai promised that there would be no clones in this game and every character would have his own move set.

The only reason there were clones in Melee is because they needed more characters and they ran out of time.
User avatar
Felix
 
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:00 am
Location: Unemployed in Greenland

Postby HyperSock » Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:08 pm

Felix wrote:I can't find you a direct quote, but I believe that Sakurai promised that there would be no clones in this game and every character would have his own move set.

The only reason there were clones in Melee is because they needed more characters and they ran out of time.


Yes, but Sakurai also said that some characters from Melee might not return.
User avatar
HyperSock
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:59 am
Location: No

Postby Seppuku » Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:16 pm

aww man i was hoping for a fall release well i guess i can wait ^^
Image

[url=myspace.com/seppukuasylum]myspace.com/seppukuasylum[/url]

"Theres no such thing as trolls!"
Then how do you explain the dead unicorns?
User avatar
Seppuku
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:46 pm
Location: Baltimore, Maryland

Postby Fish and Chips » Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:30 pm

Midna might make the cut as an assist trophy, but I doubt she'll be a playable character. And this might just be me, but I'd prefer a cast of essential characters only. Link, Zelda/Shiek, and Ganondorf fit the bill, the rest is excess, just floods the roster.

And speaking of Donkey Kong's inclusion, is it too much to ask for Captain K. Rool to join the fray? Come on, Nintendo, you know it's true.
User avatar
Fish and Chips
 
Posts: 4415
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere.

Postby Seppuku » Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:34 pm

im all set to jump in there with metaknight. im doubting the return of marth/roy i think meta is the new fast swordy.

hyped about pit too.
Image

[url=myspace.com/seppukuasylum]myspace.com/seppukuasylum[/url]

"Theres no such thing as trolls!"
Then how do you explain the dead unicorns?
User avatar
Seppuku
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:46 pm
Location: Baltimore, Maryland

Postby Debitt » Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:38 pm

HyperSock wrote:Yes, but Sakurai also said that some characters from Melee might not return.

That's disappointing to hear. D: As excited as I am for this game, I will cry if they don't give Zelda the transform ability in this game.
Image

[SIZE="5"](*゚∀゚)アハア八アッ八ッノヽ~☆[/SIZE]
[SIZE="1"]DEBS: Fan of that manga where the kid's head is on fire.[/SIZE]
User avatar
Debitt
 
Posts: 3654
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2004 10:00 am
Location: 並盛中学校

Postby Felix » Thu Jul 12, 2007 7:04 pm

Fish and Chips wrote:Midna might make the cut as an assist trophy, but I doubt she'll be a playable character. And this might just be me, but I'd prefer a cast of essential characters only. Link, Zelda/Shiek, and Ganondorf fit the bill, the rest is excess, just floods the roster.

And speaking of Donkey Kong's inclusion, is it too much to ask for Captain K. Rool to join the fray? Come on, Nintendo, you know it's true.

While I agree with you, I still think that Wolf-link+Midna would make for an interesting character with unique attacks.
Okay, so K. Rool would be really cool.
User avatar
Felix
 
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:00 am
Location: Unemployed in Greenland

Postby meboeck » Thu Jul 12, 2007 8:20 pm

I know Diddy Kong wouldn't exactly have the strongest attacks, but I'd like to see him in this one. However, he or any other Donkey Kong Country character would be a third party character, so I don't know how likely it would be to see anyone from that franchise.

Felix wrote:like how Zelda transforms into sheik, and how Samus turns into Zero suit Samus.


We don't know that Zelda will transform into Sheik this game, and as far as I know they haven't said whether Zero Suit Samus is a completely new character or just a transformation. Personally, I hope Zelda doesn't transform. It was good for GameCube since OoT had just been for the last console, but as the Zelda franchise gets bigger, Shiek becomes less important in the grand scheme. I agree with Fish and Chips that they should stick more to main characters.

Out of the new characters they've shown so far, I think I'll probable be able to handle Pit best. I like his combination of swords, arrows, and agility. I sort of reminds me of Young Link.
*insert poem, quote, or witty comment here*

"If it doesn't fit, you must edIT! -- [color=#cc3322]MOES."
[/color]
User avatar
meboeck
 
Posts: 1311
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Earth

Postby Nate » Thu Jul 12, 2007 8:53 pm

Fish and Chips wrote:And speaking of Donkey Kong's inclusion, is it too much to ask for Captain K. Rool to join the fray? Come on, Nintendo, you know it's true.

meboecker already covered this, but I'll state it more clearly. Donkey Kong is Nintendo's property. K. Rool was an original character created by Rare, same as with Diddy, Dixie, etc. Banjo also falls into this category.

Rare is now owned by Microsoft. So it's a safe bet that you won't be seeing any Rare characters in Smash Bros.
Image

Ezekiel 23:20
User avatar
Nate
 
Posts: 10725
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Oh right, like anyone actually cares.

Postby Fish and Chips » Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:13 pm

Nate wrote:meboecker already covered this, but I'll state it more clearly. Donkey Kong is Nintendo's property. K. Rool was an original character created by Rare, same as with Diddy, Dixie, etc. Banjo also falls into this category.

Rare is now owned by Microsoft. So it's a safe bet that you won't be seeing any Rare characters in Smash Bros.

Haven't read the thread till today, but thanks for the clarification.

Although on the one hand, if Hideo Kojima's Metal Gear Solid (currently under Sony's liscence) can have a guest appearance, Rare could do likewise (especailly considering the whole of the Donkey Kong series was, and still is, contained on the Nintendo market). But, with only "Two or three" third party characters confirmed/likely, odds are they wouldn't spend their breath on K. Rool or the rest of Donkey's crew.

Meh, I'm sure we'll live.
User avatar
Fish and Chips
 
Posts: 4415
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere.

Postby Mr. SmartyPants » Thu Jul 12, 2007 11:03 pm

I heard that they're taking Roy out of the game.

I always preferred him over Marth =( But I guess that's because I don't use those two characters as much, seeing as most top-tier players prefer Marth over Roy.
User avatar
Mr. SmartyPants
 
Posts: 12541
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 9:00 am

Postby Bobtheduck » Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:10 am

Yeah, Nate... Diddy belongs to MS now, but Diddy Kong racing is on DS...

Though, I heard rumors of Halo DS... If only to further kill PSP sales as MS plans their XBP, I'm sure...

December for smash brothers... Ok... I'll have a reason again to play a wii in december...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evcNPfZlrZs Watch this movie なう。 It's legal, free... And it's more than its premise. It's not saying Fast Food is good food. Just watch it.
Legend of Crying Bronies: Twilight's a Princess
Image
User avatar
Bobtheduck
 
Posts: 5867
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 9:00 am
Location: Japan, currently. Gonna be Idaho, soon.

Postby AsianBlossom » Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:56 am

Anyone see today's update? With the Animal Crossing stage? Hm?
RESPECT THE UNBORN AND CHOOSE LIFE...your mother did.

"Do not underestimate the power of the muffin! The muffin will smite all those who question it! The muffin will crush all nay-sayers! He who controls the muffin shall control the entire world!" -Taishi, Comic Party English Dub
User avatar
AsianBlossom
 
Posts: 1376
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: *staaaaaaaaaaaaaaaare*

Postby Felix » Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:47 am

Nate wrote:meboecker already covered this, but I'll state it more clearly. Donkey Kong is Nintendo's property. K. Rool was an original character created by Rare, same as with Diddy, Dixie, etc. Banjo also falls into this category.

I wondered about that, thanks for clearing it up.

Hmm, does that mean that the chances of Krystal from Starfox appearing in the game are quite slim? Because I think (can't confirm for sure) that Krystal is an original character made by Rare for Starfox Adventures, and she has since been adopted into the regular Starfox group. I wonder who actually owns the rights for that character...
I think she would make a pretty good addition in Brawl, though, since she uses that staff to fight with... and the game needs more female characters anyway.
User avatar
Felix
 
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:00 am
Location: Unemployed in Greenland

Postby uc pseudonym » Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:47 pm

Felix wrote:Chain Chomp would be another cool assist trophy.

I agree. Random enemies from various games may not be worth a character, but I imagine most players would love to see them.

Felix wrote:Also... I think it would be cool if they made goomba as a playable character... as a joke. And all you can do is move left and right... that's it.

It would make an interesting campaign or challenge level, at the very least.

Nate wrote:Rare is now owned by Microsoft. So it's a safe bet that you won't be seeing any Rare characters in Smash Bros.

I can't find the list of requirements for characters easily, so forgive this question. Considering that those characters have appeared in games on Nintendo consoles, would they be prevented from inclusion due to legal concerns? Part of me wants to think "Would they really sue them for that?" but then I realized it was a silly thought.
User avatar
uc pseudonym
 
Posts: 15506
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 4:00 am
Location: Tanzania

Postby MasterDias » Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:34 pm

Fish and Chips wrote:Midna might make the cut as an assist trophy, but I doubt she'll be a playable character. And this might just be me, but I'd prefer a cast of essential characters only. Link, Zelda/Shiek, and Ganondorf fit the bill, the rest is excess, just floods the roster.

And speaking of Donkey Kong's inclusion, is it too much to ask for Captain K. Rool to join the fray? Come on, Nintendo, you know it's true.


Well, as far as characters go, I don't mind if all of the SSBM gang don't come back as much, but I'd prefer that they take more time to actually design the characters....instead of basically sticking in already-existing characters with tweaked stats, like they did with some of the unlockables in Melee.
-----------------------------------------
"Always seek to do good to one another and to all."
1 Thessalonians 5:15

"Every story must have an ending." - Auron - Final Fantasy X

"A small stone may make a ripple at first, but someday it will be a wave." - Wiegraf - Final Fantasy Tactics
User avatar
MasterDias
 
Posts: 2714
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 4:56 pm
Location: Texas

Postby Nate » Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:42 pm

uc pseudonym wrote:I can't find the list of requirements for characters easily, so forgive this question. Considering that those characters have appeared in games on Nintendo consoles, would they be prevented from inclusion due to legal concerns? Part of me wants to think "Would they really sue them for that?" but then I realized it was a silly thought.

It's not that they're prevented from inclusion. Like Bob said, Diddy Kong Racing did appear on the DS. It's just the matter that Rare is owned by Microsoft now, so Nintendo isn't just free to use the characters as they see fit, they'd have to get permission from Rare. I can't see Nintendo going to all that trouble...it's the same reason why (sadly) I don't think Banjo will be on the VC.
Felix wrote:I wonder who actually owns the rights for that character...

Rare, for the same reasons that Square-Enix still owns the rights to Mallow, Geno, etc. from Super Mario RPG. Though Nintendo still owns Fox, any characters created by Rare are owned by Rare. It's just how the system works.

I think. I could be rusty on copyright law, so correct me if I'm wrong.
Image

Ezekiel 23:20
User avatar
Nate
 
Posts: 10725
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Oh right, like anyone actually cares.

Postby HyperSock » Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:09 pm

Nate wrote:I think. I could be rusty on copyright law, so correct me if I'm wrong.


YOU'RE WRONG!!!

(I always wanted to say that. Kudos to me! :dance: )
Do you not find it amusing? You can control somebody's mind briefly, but instantaneously!

...

See? I'm doing it right now by making you read my sig!

Be sure to PM me if I briefly overtook your mind!

People I've overtaken (briefly): AsianBlossom, Sanji07, mathgrant
User avatar
HyperSock
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:59 am
Location: No

Postby AsianBlossom » Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:15 pm

Ouch.
RESPECT THE UNBORN AND CHOOSE LIFE...your mother did.

"Do not underestimate the power of the muffin! The muffin will smite all those who question it! The muffin will crush all nay-sayers! He who controls the muffin shall control the entire world!" -Taishi, Comic Party English Dub
User avatar
AsianBlossom
 
Posts: 1376
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: *staaaaaaaaaaaaaaaare*

Postby HyperSock » Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:41 pm

AsianBlossom wrote:Ouch.


YOU'RE WRONG!

(I always wanted to say that. Kudos to me! :dance: )
Do you not find it amusing? You can control somebody's mind briefly, but instantaneously!

...

See? I'm doing it right now by making you read my sig!

Be sure to PM me if I briefly overtook your mind!

People I've overtaken (briefly): AsianBlossom, Sanji07, mathgrant
User avatar
HyperSock
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:59 am
Location: No

Postby Felix » Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:37 am

Nate wrote:Rare, for the same reasons that Square-Enix still owns the rights to Mallow, Geno, etc. from Super Mario RPG. Though Nintendo still owns Fox, any characters created by Rare are owned by Rare. It's just how the system works.

Okay, thanks. That's sad to hear, but I still hope that those character's find their way into the game, since their lives have been predominantly, if not solely on Nintendo systems.

Also, Hypersock, there's no reason for you to post if you're not contributing something relevant to the topic. It just clutters up the thread for people who are reading it. ^^;
User avatar
Felix
 
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:00 am
Location: Unemployed in Greenland

Postby tokiklok » Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:23 pm

so who do you think would win between jiggly and kirby? ^.^
Image
Made by Seppuku ^-^

Image
User avatar
tokiklok
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 4:29 pm
Location: baltomore

Postby uc pseudonym » Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:16 pm

I'll assume you mean in a general, popularity-contest type of way. Personally, I'd go for Kirby. He has a wide variety of abilities and the potential to acquire many more. Jigglypuff can sing, and that's about it (and hit hard, in the game, but I think SSB gave it this out of pity).
User avatar
uc pseudonym
 
Posts: 15506
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 4:00 am
Location: Tanzania

Postby Felix » Wed Jul 18, 2007 5:46 pm

Well I know that if I was playing as kirby I would probably swallow Jigglypuff and kamikaze dive-bomb off the edge of the map. I hear that that practice is frowned upon in some circles, however, so I don't know...

Anyway, on the Smash Dojo today, it is revealed that Samus's "final smash" is the zero laser thing which shoots that massive... laser... thing... and it appears that this destroys her power suit and turns her into Zero-suit Samus. I wonder if this is the only wat to turn into her?
User avatar
Felix
 
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:00 am
Location: Unemployed in Greenland

Postby Cognitive Gear » Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:55 pm

tokiklok wrote:so who do you think would win between jiggly and kirby? ^.^


In SSBM? Jigs. Otherwise Kirby. Because he is amazing.

Image
[font="Tahoma"][SIZE="2"]"It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things."

-Terry Pratchett[/SIZE][/font]
User avatar
Cognitive Gear
 
Posts: 2381
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 9:00 am

Postby Slater » Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:23 pm

I was never too good with either Jiggly or Kirby... Along with Peach, they're my three worst chars by far to play as. But Jiggly will always be the prime giant-killer.
Image
User avatar
Slater
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 10:00 am
Location: Pacifica, Caliphornia

Postby tokiklok » Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:48 pm

well jiggly puff is cute
Image
Made by Seppuku ^-^

Image
User avatar
tokiklok
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 4:29 pm
Location: baltomore

Postby Tommy » Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:54 am

What does Kirby look like when he sucks up Jiggly Puff?
User avatar
Tommy
 
Posts: 5745
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:00 pm
Location: Plymouth, Mass

Previous Next

Return to Video Games and VG Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests