Wingzero22 wrote:I didn't like that movie, because it was comedy base a true story and the movie never put in facts on the true of the story.
Facts smacts. The General was inspired by a real event but it never really claimed to be a true story or a version of that story. There is no "this is based on a true story" in the opening credits, or anything similar in the whole movie. If you had to fault movies solely on facts, then a lot of good movies would have to be buried, movies with more blatant fictional takes on real events and people. In the long list "The General" is most certainly the least..
• Lawrence of Arabia (fictional take on Lawrence)
• Bridge on the River Kwai (shamelessly ahistorical as anything ever produced by Hollwood)
• The Last Samurai (same as above)
• Amadeus (overblows the rivalry between Salieri and Mozart)
• Braveheart (very sloppy history)
• Star Wars (no historical basis whatsoever, yet claims to have taken place a long time ago... okay I'm being sardonic)
• Fargo (claims to be based on a true story but is deliberately fictional)
• A Beautiful Mind (practically fiction)
• Any Robin Hood movie
• Gladiator (little or no accuracy)
• Sound of Music (they escaped in the trains, not per foot over the mountains)
• Cyrano de Bergerac (the real Cyrano was a bitter, misanthropic man as opposed to Edmond Rostand's super-romantic genius poet).
The list goes on. I don't let the lack of facts remove anything from these movies since I like them all (Amadeus and Fargo are specifically favourites of mine).