Impact Alberto wrote:No problem, and I agree that some clichés are fine, it's just when you write something like A Midnight Opera, you run into trouble. Derivative works that include nothing really original are the bane of my existence.
Unfortunately it is obviously not everyone's bane. ]...I can always improve, and I work at that.[/QUOTE]
I think as long as an artist admits that, even when he became successful, that he still can learn and improvethen he has nothing to fear artistically.
Impact Alberto wrote:But I think difference stands out. Look at Death Note, for example. It runs in a magazine that's pretty much home to shounen manga about fighting and sports, yet it's one of the most popular and highest rated manga of all time because of two things: it's different, and it's really good.
I still have to get acquainted with Death Note, but I know its pretty darn popular.
Impact Alberto wrote:Also, I liked your comment about things being a bit silly with a random depressing revelation from everyone's past coming up. Hopefully writers will realize that not everyone needs to have some dark past full of death and depression. It's fine for certain characters in your story, but it goes back to the aspect of varied characters. With variation comes the idea that people handle things differently, and not everybody has to sit around and be all angry and angsting when something dramatic happens. But I could go on forever.
It could be very funny in a parody. "My father was a pumpkin and my mother a turnip - the vegetable patch never accepted me and sent me off to be diced at an early age." Just kidding.
Well, strictly speaking there is something bothering each of us somewhere in our lives. But not all our flaws, thorns in the side and such are traumatic in nature. Only one or two of the characters (if it is a big cast) should have some obnoxious revelation from his past - the rest can just be normal problems like a failing body, deteriorating eye-sight, illiteracy, etc. These things make things interesting. Bruce Willis' character in
Sin City is almost a perfect person, almost the best person in the story, too bad his heart is no good. Real problems, like a faltering faith in God, or a bad heart, is more compelling than "I was stolen from my mother by Rumpelstiltskin and I'll never escape his evil grip from beyond the grave".
Impact Alberto wrote:As I said before, look, there's nothing wrong with fantasy or action, but you don't always have to do stuff like that. A bunch of crazy angsting people in black leather outfits with guns that fire exploding chainsaws fighting everyone and throwing around random terms that make no sense to anyone other than the writer is not something I want to read.
I know. I like comics with action and stuff in it, but I'm not dependant on it. In fact, I like it when it spends more time building atmosphere and character rather than trying to entertain people with attention defecit disorder (although I have attention defecit disorder and I prefer movies and comics that can artistically achieve a slow deliberate pace). I mean, too much action can be very monotonous in itself.
A book like
Crime and Punishment (not a comic, though) for instance has no action, but the 'action' takes place in the character's head entirely it, and that is what makes it interesting - his spiritual and philosophical struggles and attempts to justify his actions. I prefer character developement and good dialoge to action-scenes. Always have, although good original action-scenes are good too.
I think though another thing that writers shouldn't do is have the stories explain themselves. Things left unsaid (that is limited exposition and 'pay-off') or implied make stories more interesting than those that have long-winded explanations. I find that exposition sometimes make a movie or book only more confusing (or sillier) rather than clarifying it. A good example is the anime movie "X" (I never read the manga or saw the anime series). The more they explained the plot, the more the movie got confusing and the more I found the whole ordeal just plain silly.
Impact Alberto wrote:I copied the top rated manga list from Anime News Network. Look at that list. Out of all ten, only Berserk, Akira, and Kenshin are "action" titles. Akira isn't as much action as it was just extremely influential to everything that came after it. Kenshin, while not my personal favourite or anything close, is just an action series done right, and Berserk is a long-running and slow moving series that's my personal favourite, not because it has fighting or lots of violence and stuff, because the story is incredible, and well written. True it does fit a lot of the clichés I can't stand, but the thing is, Berserk just does all of them right. If you're going to use a lot of clichés, you're gonna have to be really talented to pull them off, like Kentarou Miura is.
Hmmmmm. I'll really have to check out Beserk someday.
Impact Alberto wrote:But look at that list. Stuff like 20th Century Boys and Monster is a perfect example of really good stuff that doesn't need to be about lots of fighting and screaming.
Hmmm. I've only heard of those. I'll read those some day. Oh how the list just keeps on growing.