rocklobster wrote:1. I thought Dr. Tenma was supposed to be a sympathetic villain, not a terrible dad.
Um no. You should read the manga. In the original manga, Dr. Tenma sold him to an evil circus owner. He in fact hated Astro Boy and regretted creating him. So that's actually completely 100%]2. Why was Tenma's partner given such a small part?[/QUOTE]
Because the character wasn't important, and since Tenma didn't even have a partner in the original manga, it'd be difficult to make a character that didn't exist in the original storyline have a large part.
3. Why didn't they make it more like the REAL story?
I haven't seen this movie but from the two things you've said, it sounds exactly like the REAL story, completely faithful at least as far as the origin is concerned (barring the nonexistent partner in the original).
This was just bad.
You haven't said how it was bad. You said three things that don't count as being terrible. For example, all the things you've said I could apply to Lord of the Rings. "They took out Tom Bombadil! And they made Merry and Pippin act dumb instead of being smart but naive! And Aragon didn't carry around his broken sword! They changed so much from the book so it sucks!" But Lord of the Rings was a great set of movies even though they changed things from the books. Just saying "It's different from the book" doesn't make a movie bad.
So what made it bad? Was the pacing poor? Were the fight scenes uninspired? Was the voice acting bad? Was the plot nonsensical?
I'm not arguing with you that the movie isn't bad. It may very well be bad. You just haven't given any statements to support this conclusion.