Postby shooraijin » Fri Feb 18, 2005 7:25 am
The difference to me is that antique computers, particularly notable ones like the 2600, the SX-64, etc., should be preserved instead of shredded. You can relandscape a lawn, but you can't get the original components for a VCS anymore (you can make a VHDL emulation or an ASIC if you have the buck$, but that's not the same thing).
(I generally make an exception for PCs not (just) because I dislike them, but because most PCs use easily available or interchangeable parts and you can easily build a new one that will run your old software. Heck, I can still buy new ISA cards at Fry's -- for the 486 I use for playing DOS games, I got a new Sound Blaster 16 ISA right off the store shelf. I also put many PCI Macs in this category for the same reason, although NuBus and the original Compact Macs are weird enough that they should probably be saved instead of eviscerated.)
So, for my money, I liken it again to smashing stained glass windows. They're historical artifacts which should be admired, not like taking the Mona Lisa canvas and throwing it out so you can use the frame.
"you're a doctor.... and 27 years.... so...doctor + 27 years = HATORI SOHMA" - RoyalWing, when I was 27
"Al hail the forum editting Shooby! His vibes are law!" - Osaka-chan
I could still be champ, but I'd feel bad taking it away from one of the younger guys. - George Foreman