shooraijin wrote:Wow ... I just wish I knew what that all was ...
Care to give us a quick intro?
Sure. Basically, the way a lot of students are introduced to signal processing/telecommunications is by allowing certain assumptions about the signals or the channel. Namely, that the signal's statistics are already known, as is the nature of the channel (and that both do not change over time- this is called stationarity). In many real-life problems this doesn't hold, especially in the more interesting, cutting edge applications. In adaptive signal processing, we weaken the assumptions about prior knowledge and system stationarity. The remaining information is filled in by the signal itself, if we can extract the relevant information. In other words, the processing system adapts to the signal or to the environment (or both), so that we can achieve our principle objective, which is to use the information being transmitted. And since the channel/signal changes often with time, this adaptation should occur over time as well.
What we interested in doing (my co-author and I) was to teach some of these concepts using the Simulink software package. This is a MATLAB-based graphical system design package that is widely used in industry for control systems, telecommuncations, etc. The reason for doing this was two-fold: to introduce the signal processing concepts, and to aid the students in acquiring experience with an important design tool. Using Simulink, the students can abstract away many of the programming details and just come to grips with the algorithm's structure and capabilities. In addition, since Simulink uses hierachical blocks, this also allows the students
to make use of the algorithms in a real-world applications, and to combine them where appropriate. For example, one algorithm is better suited to speech compression, while another is better suited to digital equalization. The two algorithms can be easily combined in a simple application that encodes, modulates, and transmits the data and another that handles similar functions for a receiver. And as I mentioned, since the package is graphical, it is easy to see how the components all fit together.
The scientific method," Thomas Henry Huxley once wrote, "is nothing but the normal working of the human mind." That is to say, when the mind is working; that is to say further, when it is engaged in corrrecting its mistakes. Taking this point of view, we may conclude that science is not physics, biology, or chemistry—is not even a "subject"—but a moral imperative drawn from a larger narrative whose purpose is to give perspective, balance, and humility to learning.
Neil Postman
(The End of Education)
Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge
Isaac Aasimov