Oh, goody. One of these.
Since you seem to have a hard time getting what people are talking about when they critique your spelling and grammar, I'm going to be REALLY specific and hope it gets through.
Question: Are you even using spellcheck? Not that Spellcheck is the be-all end-all of correct spelling, but it will at least filter out things like "tomarrow," which I'm fairly certain isn't a word in any existing language.
October 10th- The harvest moon light compliments the pulsating night, as the streets glistened from a passing mist.
As Davidizer pointed out, you're mixing up your tenses. Never start out a sentence in the present tense ("compliments") and end it in the past tense ("glistened"). In fact, you did it in your very first sentence. "This city
had a population... and reports
reveal that it
appears to be..." Pick a tense and stick with it.
Also... what the heck is a "pulsating night"? You know what "pulsating" means, right?
pul·sate
/ˈpəlˌsāt/
Verb
Expand and contract with strong regular movements.
Produce a regular throbbing sensation or sound.
Synonyms
pulse - throb - beat - vibrate - palpitate - tremble
How does a night pulsate? It's somehow producing a throbbing sensation? It's expanding and contracting with strong, regular movements? And how would a harvest moon compliment this rumored "pulsating"? You've basically just picked out words that sound good to you but mean absolutely nothing when strung together.
the shadows of the districts rooftop
District's. You've got a possessive noun here, so you use an apostrophe. You may not seem to think that grammar matters much, but the entirety of the English language disagrees with you.
'Hissss'! warned a white cat and a near by trash can rattled. An alarming presence was felt. 'Honey did you hear that?,' the tipsy woman nervously wondered. ' ahh, it's just a cat babe, No worries.,' her partner replied.
There is so much wrong with this. As I believe Davidizer pointed out, cat scares are extremely overused. What does it add to the story? If you removed the cat, what would be missing? Answer: a pointless cat. Also... "An alarming presence was felt" is just a clunky sentence that makes no sense. By whom? By the cat? By the tipsy woman? How did she feel it? Intuitively? Or did something grope her from the shadows?
Also, again, grammar: When using a quotation, you never end the quotation with two punctuation marks ('Honey did you hear that?,'). Also, you should be using double quotation marks. Here's what your conversation SHOULD look like:
"Honey, did you hear that?" the tipsy woman nervously wondered.
"Ahh, it's just a cat, babe. No worries," her partner replied.
TAKE CAREFUL NOTE OF EVERY CORRECTION I MADE. THERE IS NOT JUST ONE. THERE ARE FIVE. And that's just trying to get your sentences up to par grammatically; I haven't even gone into why it's bad writing. You've used too many adjectives in that first sentence: "the tipsy woman nervously wondered" is just clunky writing. Show us that she's nervous and tipsy, don't tell us. For one thing, you've already told us they're intoxicated. You don't need to say it again. And instead of "nervously wondered," you could replace it with something more dynamic and illustrative, such as, "the woman asked, her voice shaking as she glanced warily at her surroundings." Instead of telling us that she is "nervously wondering," in this sentence the author has demonstrated nervousness without once saying the word "nervous." That's the key to "show, don't tell," and it makes the difference between junior high English Comp writing, and writing that catches the reader's interest.
Oglar: A slender crimson clothed general with studded silver armor walked before his muscle: Megron and Otek, two 7 foot armoured spiked soldiers.
This sentence needs a colonoscopy, and by that I mean that you've seriously misused colons and should probably study high school grammar again. First of all, it's a clunky way to introduce characters, but if you MUST introduce them this way, here's how you would do it with CORRECT grammar: "Oglar, a slender, crimson-clothed general with studded silver armor, walked before his muscle: Megron and Otek, two 7-foot soldiers in spiked armor." The way you wrote "7 foot armoured spiked soldiers" is just really bad. The phrase "spiked soldiers" implies that they might be at least as intoxicated as the couple. Or perhaps by "spiked soldiers" you mean that if one were to eat them, one would get high?
I'm going to skip the next paragraph, not because there are no problems, but because there are so many that if I critiqued everything wrong with your story I'd be writing a novel myself.
But I'll bring up what someone else and I myself have already mentioned before: When you have multiple people talking, you start a new paragraph when the next person starts talking. Don't clump all of everyone's talking into one paragraph. It's terribly hard to read and it's not good writing at all.
In fact, there's only one more thing I can bear to specifically critique. Critique junkie that I am, I've already had my fill. I hope I've given you enough pointers to make your story more tolerable for the next run around. The one more thing I
have to address is what Davidizer already mentioned:
'No meal tonight boys!', she shouted, gesturing a 'NO' as she wagged her finger.
What. The. What. Seriously, the reason I'm addressing it is because Davidizer addressed it
and you defended it like you didn't get that it's a terrible idea. First of all... no, wait. I have no first of all because a million reasons NOT to do this are occurring to me all at once. For some reason it brings to mind this part of Jurassic park:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfiQYRn7fBg ... but don't try to draw a flattering comparison there, please. Your story is nowhere near even kissing the triceratops dropping pile of that worthy film.
I seriously don't know what you're trying to accomplish with making your heroine look like a total idiot. The only conclusion I can come to is this: You've got this idea that you want this to be manga or a graphic novel of some kind, so you have this random smattering of images in your head. You think the image of her wagging her finger like a granny at three vampires will somehow establish her character and make her interesting or something. But you don't have the talent, the know-how, or the patience to actually create a graphic novel, so you take these lazy images you've concocted and put them to paper... lazily.
Here's the thing about writing: there are tens of thousands of people just like you who have ideas just like yours. So what makes your story stand out from the other tens of thousands of stories that everybody's throwing about like so many feces in a monkey enclosure? If you don't
at the very least get your grammar up to snuff, your story will be dismissed by publishers and readers alike after the first paragraph. After all, what makes you think people want you to write a story when you can't even be bothered to write English properly?
You may not care, but it's so insulting to the millions of people who have studied and labored over the English language and know how to do it
right. No student of English worth his salt will want anything to do with a book where the author clearly knows less about English than the reader himself does!
And that's not
even going into the problems with your plot, characters, methods, and writing style in general. I'd normally be more gentle but reading the rest of this thread (this entire website, really) I see this pattern where you consistently defend the things you've been critiqued for, rather than saying, "Hey, you know what, that's a good point, I clearly need to rethink this stuff." Rather than getting defensive, take the critique in stride and understand that if you listen to what people are saying, your writing will improve. Don't say, "It's my style," or "naw, he's not sexist, he's just kind of rough" or any of the other weak defenses you've offered. Instead, trust some people who have put a lot of thought and effort into their own writing, that they might actually have a pretty good idea what they are talking about.
PS Davidizer's rewrite is awesome, and you would do well to pay close attention to the way he changed the story. My only real criticism is that I'm not sure what "tatami curtains" are, because tatami is flooring. Could he perhaps be referring to sudare?
But that's a minor detail. Pay attention to the way he set up the scene, helping us to kind of actually get to know the couple a little bit before they're attacked. He didn't do that just because it was fun; doing that allowed us, as the audience, to actually care a little bit what happens to this couple. And introducing Yozara as a somewhat timid vigilante also helped us to care more about what happened to her and whether she won or not. Plus, his attention to proper grammar and punctuation (I did find a few typos, but less than five, I think, and that's definitely forgivable) reduced the distraction and helped me get into the story. That's the main point I've been trying to make: bad grammar is distracting at best, and downright infuriating at worst. Please, please, PLEASE study grammar.