Cracking the Da Vinci Code: A Discourse

Unleash your creative writing skills here.

Postby Arnobius » Sat May 13, 2006 7:20 pm

Technomancer wrote:True, but we must also be aware that the converse is also true. Those supporting a particular view (and I include Christians in this) are likewise just as susceptible to either fallaciously accepting material that supports their position, or rejecting material that disagrees with it. Shoddy scholarship, intellectual laziness, and wishful thinking aren't exactly rare amongst Christians either.

Yes this is true as well. My post was just looking into the phenomenon of "The DaVinci Code", but yes Christians have their own "urban legends" as well, whether sectarian or spiritual vs secular. So long as faith is not defined as blind following or tradition equated with myth or mere custom, I would agree.

One thing that bothers me is that sometimes it seems as though some try to attack Christian beliefs by a chronological argument, saying that it is too old to be credible or too new (compared to other institutions) to be original, so appeals to the teachings of the church or the Bible are rejected, not for a good reason, but because of when the defense was written and Christian beliefs become either "out of date" or "plagiarized from earlier sources."
User avatar
Arnobius
 
Posts: 2870
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 11:41 pm

Postby Technomancer » Sat May 13, 2006 7:35 pm

I agree that the question of age should be irrelevant. However, the issue of whether Christianity (and Judaism) borrowed from other traditions should be taken seriously. We must be prepared to understand that other cultures/religions/mythologies did exert a significant influence on the development of Judaism and Christianity.
The scientific method," Thomas Henry Huxley once wrote, "is nothing but the normal working of the human mind." That is to say, when the mind is working; that is to say further, when it is engaged in corrrecting its mistakes. Taking this point of view, we may conclude that science is not physics, biology, or chemistry—is not even a "subject"—but a moral imperative drawn from a larger narrative whose purpose is to give perspective, balance, and humility to learning.

Neil Postman
(The End of Education)

Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge

Isaac Aasimov
User avatar
Technomancer
 
Posts: 2379
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 11:47 am
Location: Tralfamadore

Postby Arnobius » Sat May 13, 2006 8:18 pm

Technomancer wrote:I agree that the question of age should be irrelevant. However, the issue of whether Christianity (and Judaism) borrowed from other traditions should be taken seriously. We must be prepared to understand that other cultures/religions/mythologies did exert a significant influence on the development of Judaism and Christianity.

Yes, I understand what you're saying. Certainly Greek philosophy has had a role in expressing Christian thought to the world, for example. My concern was with those claims that every essential element of Christianity and Judaism was plagiarized from other religions or that foreign beliefs were brought into Christianity that were not what the apostles intended. The earliest Christians and the Jews had a strong aversion to the idea of idolatry, which is something that needs to be remembered when trying to assess influence of the influence of surrounding culture. The pagan Romans for example thought the Christians to be very impious for not taking part in their rituals.
User avatar
Arnobius
 
Posts: 2870
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 11:41 pm

Previous

Return to Writing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 172 guests