Postby Cognitive Gear » Sat Dec 09, 2006 5:56 pm
The following is my opinion; and should be taken as an opinion that can potentially change, and is in no way intended to frustrate, irritate, or otherwise anger anyone:
In My opinion, Hideo Kojima's games are not art. They are not made to be such. They are made simply to entertain. Hideo is an entertainer, and sees himself as such. He mimics the cinematography of hollywood in order to help himself attain his goal of entertaining.
This is not to say that games cannot be art. They are an extremely capable medium. They provide a wonderful 3-D canvas on which the artist can create his world; tell his story, deliver his self expression.
Also, it should be noted that calling something "not art" is not an insult. There is plenty of music in the world that is not art, but is still great and entertaining. There are lots of drawings in the world; but not all of them are art. The same goes for movies and video games. Some are art; others are not. I believe that the intent of the creator must be to create art for it to qualify as art.
I'm sure that the opinion I have shared will be fairly controversial; so please discuss in an intelligent and flame-resistant manner. The reason I share this opinion with you is that I feel it is more harmful to point at Hideo Kojima's games as examples of art than it is helpful when debating the viability of games as an art form. When the very man you point to as a great artist tells everyone that he is not creating art, then the debate is already over. Please, point at more artistic games, such as Okami or Ico.
[font="Tahoma"][SIZE="2"]"It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things."
-Terry Pratchett[/SIZE][/font]